data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b201/4b201d790b1489a7628bdf17452fad15473f6a23" alt="U.S. Supreme Court U.S. Supreme Court"
Today the U.S. Supreme Court denied cert in the Sprint v. County of San Diego and Level 3 v. St. Louis cases.
For local governments and telecom carriers in the 9th Circuit, this means that telecom carriers who want to challenge a zoning decision will in most ever case have to show that the local ordinance, AS APPLIED, acts as a prohibition to the provision of a telecom service.
Under the old, now overruled standard, a telecom carrier needed only to show that a local ordinance could prevent a provider from providing a telecom service (the so-called ‘facial attack’).
Tom Bunton, Esq., of the County Counsel’s office in San Diego is a hero to local governments.
Jonathan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83f76/83f7669a979be12ec88355a72343252d494ca8b9" alt="Share on Facebook Facebook"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5aa34/5aa347df53e75366c6b19bb9c9e5caabcd3b24c8" alt="Share on Twitter twitter"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1971/c1971436ebf6da314c67a3a7a77aa4b4db785b9a" alt="Share on Reddit reddit"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14430/144301f4c431abeec744c4a793e80c337bac95f3" alt="Pin it with Pinterest pinterest"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3f6b/c3f6bc4331056ad69ff6cb1e6df0e9679609353a" alt="Share on Linkedin linkedin"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6103f/6103f5a49c5dcaaf39983c2dd07abf259bd95ecc" alt="Share by email mail"