February 2013 » Dr. Jonathan L. Kramer on Wireless Siting & Law

Given my busy schedule, there are only a few wireless industry conferences I carve out time to attend each year. My criteria for going to a conference center around factors such as:

Quality of the speakers
Timeliness of the information
Real usability of the information learned at the conference
Opportunity to meaningfully network with peers on both sides
Value-for-time I spend at the conference
Value-for-price to attend the conference

The #1 (with a bullet) conference I make time to get to each year is one (and usually more) of AGL Magazine’s regional conferences. In fact, I try to get to at least two each year.

Regardless of whether you’re on the government side or the industry side, I think AGL’s regional conferences are the place to be, the place to hear, and the place to learn. My entire staff and I will be attending at least two of them this year (Irvine and San Francisco…come up and say hi).

The AGL regional conferences this year are:

March: ATLANTA
April: IRVINE
June: ST. LOUIS
September: CHICAGO
November: BOSTON
December: SAN FRANCISCO

Check out the regional conferences at http://agl-mag.com/aglevents/. Then sign up to attend one or more of them. When you see the cost to attend the day-long events (with lunch), no, it’s not a typo.

Finally, if you don’t subscribe to AGL Magazine already, you’re missing out on one of the best sources of useful industry information: http://agl-mag.com/subscribe/

Jonathan

PS: NO, I’m not being paid to endorse AGL…I really do depend on AGL that much as a primary source of “RUS”…Really Useful Stuff.

Last night I watched a tower siting appeal hearing before the City Council of Albany, California. During the hearing, a resident came up to the speakers podium. As part of his public comment, the resident attempted to make a comparison between cell site emissions and the emissions from a microwave oven. To hammer home his point, he brought in and set up a special microwave oven in the front row of the Council Chamber.

Trying to make a point attempting to compare cell tower emissions to those from a microwave oven, the resident told the City Council that he modified the microwave oven to bypass all of the safety mechanisms. All microwave ovens come with at least two safety interlocks that immediately shut down the microwave oven if the door is opened during the cooking cycle.

The resident then proceeded to make his point by operating the microwave oven by cooking what he identified as a grilled cheese sandwich–with the microwave door open and the microwave cavity pointed at the City Council and staff.

(Screen capture from KALB TV at 0:57:47 into the meeting)

In my opinion, the resident’s ‘demonstration’ was a disingenuous and dangerous stunt. I have never seen such a stunt in 29 years of public service.

It is meaningless to attempt to compare the emissions from a 900 watt microwave oven emitting into a focused cavity resting on a chair in a meeting hall with a cell site professionally engineered to comply with federal standards (this is the disingenuous part).

While the microwave emissions may not (or may, for that matter) have exceeded the FCC’s/FDA’s standard beyond a measurable distance, no inquiry was made by the resident as to whether anyone nearby was using a pacemaker (this is the dangerous part).

Moreover, the use of an electrical extension cord to power an appliance (and to do so in a public meeting area) violates various electrical and other safety codes.

Had I been at the meeting in person, I would have stepped in to prevent or stop the stunt.

To pound the key points home:

Don’t do what this resident did…don’t ever endanger the public trying to make a point;
Don’t do what this resident did…don’t ever bypass safety interlocks intended to protect the public trying to make a point;
Don’t do what this resident did…don’t ever violate safety codes trying to make a point;

Look, I’m all for the public expressing views at a public hearing. I am, in fact, a dyed-in-the-wool supporter of public participation in the government process.

Heck, I can live with the disingenuous participation part since it is still a public viewpoint, and even disingenuous public viewpoints are important in an open public debate.

What I do not support, however, are expressions of public participation in the government process in ways that are dangerous and/or illegal.

That’s my opinion on this resident’s stunt. What’s yours?

Jonathan

Month: February 2013

AGL Regional Conferences: Must-Go Events

A Disingenuous and Dangerous Stunt